【推文】James Lindsay - I put most of it down to Communism, but that's an abbreviation for convenience..

這是 James Lindsay 最近寫的長推文串

連結

• 原推文 - x.com/conceptualjame...

• Thread Reader App版本（一頁版本） - threadreaderapp.com/...

原文及個人翻譯

So let's talk a little about the thing we've actually been fighting. If you follow me, you know I put most of it down to Communism (or Bolshevism), but that's an abbreviation for convenience. "Communism" is a 20th-century thing. We're fighting a Communist-Fascist hybrid. 🧵

We'll obviously have to explain what Communism, Fascism, Bolshevism, and Sovietism all are to really understand the thing we're actually up against (and making headway against!), but let's start by pointing out that today's grand global evil is a blend of these things.

所以讓我們來談談我們實際在對抗的東西。如果你一直在關注我，你知道我把大部分問題歸咎於共產主義（或布爾什維克主義（Bolshevism）），但這只是為了方便而做的簡化。「共產主義」是20世紀的產物。我們正在對抗的是共產主義和法西斯主義的混合體。🧵

為了真正理解（並應對！）我們所面對的挑戰，我們顯然需要解釋共產主義、法西斯主義、布爾什維克主義和蘇聯主義是什麼，但讓我們首先指出，當今全球的重大邪惡是這些因素的混合。

Our job today isn't just to stop Communism. It's to stop Communism and Fascism packaged as one, although either aspect of that union can be pushed to the front at any given time, like a one-two punch combination. The WEF and CCP are both Communist-Fascist hybrids on a new model.

I've described this new model in a talk in which I gave it a ton of names, including Communo-Fascism, Corporate Communism, Corporatist Communism, and, probably best, 21st-Century Communism. It's a new model of Communism for a new century.

https://newdiscourses.com/2024/12/communism-3-0-corporate-communism/

我們今天的任務不僅僅是阻止共產主義。我們要阻止的是以一種新形式包裝的共產主義和法西斯主義的結合體，儘管這種結合的任何一個方面都可能在任何時候被推到前線，就像一記重拳的組合。世界經濟論壇（WEF）和中國共產黨（CCP）都是這種新型的共產主義-法西斯主義混合體。

我在一個演講中描述了這種新模式，並給它取了許多名字，包括Communo-Fascism、企業共產主義（Corporate Communism）、公司共產主義（Corporatist Communism），以及最準確的名稱：21世紀共產主義。這是一種為新世紀打造的新型共產主義模式。

newdiscourses.com/20...

Another relevant term that has to be understood to get this is "Dengism," which is short for "Deng Xiaoping Theory." Dengism is the basis for the current model in China and was developed in the 1970s-1990s there in conjunction with American interests.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deng_Xiaoping_Theory

另一個需要理解的相關術語是「鄧主義」，即「鄧小平理論」的縮寫。鄧主義是中國當前模式的基礎，是在20世紀70年代至90年代期間，與美國利益相結合而發展起來的。

en.wikipedia.org/wik...

Deng Xiaoping inherited a broken Chinese economy from Mao Zedong and, being a pragmatist, sought to make China's economy work no matter what. For some set of reasons, some better than others, Rockefeller, Kissinger, Brzezinski, and even Klaus Schwab helped Deng build a new model.

Deng's idea was "Open Up!" He called it "one country, two systems." The idea was to maintain the Chinese Communist Party control and model but to update Marxism to a new model with a new "Theory of Productive Forces" (Lenin) borrowed from National Socialism and Fascism.

The result is a model that takes the Communist political theory, ambition, political structure, and long-term vision (a fully realized Communist global order) and makes itself productive by placing a Fascist economic program under the hood, so to speak.

鄧小平從毛澤東那裡繼承了一個破碎的中國經濟，作為一個實用主義者，他不顧一切地尋求讓中國的經濟運作起來。出於各種原因，有些比其他原因更令人信服，Rockefeller、Kissinger、Brzezinski甚至是Klaus Schwab都幫助鄧小平建立了一個新模式。

鄧小平的理念是「開放！」他稱之為「一國兩制」。這個理念是維持中國共產黨的控制和模式，但將馬克思主義更新為一個新模式，並從國家社會主義和法西斯主義那裡借來新的「生產力理論」（列寧）。

結果是一種將共產主義的政治理論、野心、政治結構和長期願景（一個完全實現的共產主義全球秩序）與法西斯主義經濟計劃相結合的模式，後者是所謂的「引擎」所在。

In practice, the CCP owns all land, raw materials, and heavy industrial capital and has total control over the Chinese economy and its players, but individual actors get to use that state-owned capital to make as much money as they can, thus unleashing the productive forces.

Because the "means of production" (land, raw materials, and heavy industrial capital) are all owned by the PRC, which is controlled by the CCP, technically the Communist Party still owns (has seized) the means of production. You can get rich, but only at the pleasure of the CCP.

在實踐中，中國共產黨擁有所有土地、原材料和重工業資本，並對中國經濟及其參與者擁有完全控制權。但個人參與者可以使用這些國有資本賺取盡可能多的財富，從而釋放生產力。

因為「生產手段」（土地、原材料和重工業資本）都由中華人民共和國所有，而中華人民共和國由中國共產黨控制，從技術上講，共產主義政黨仍然擁有（奪取）生產手段。你可以變富，但只能在中國共產黨允許的情況下。

What does this have to do with the West? Simple: the People's Republic of China is the beta test for the hybrid model ("21st-Century Communism" or "Corporatist Communism" or "Fascist Communism" on Mussolini's definition), and we're implementing it kind of upside-down with ESG.

ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance "social credit" scoring for corporations run by large index fund firms) is the Chinese model being implemented without a dictatorship like Deng Xiaoping controlled, but it's also being implemented upside-down, to constrain production.

The primary purpose of ESG scoring is to limit and constrain the productive forces in the West, especially energy, food, and transportation, plus education as a long-term program. It's to slowly capture capital into a Dengist 21st-Century Communist-Fascist hybrid model.

There are reasons this model is being used to crush Western economies while allowing the Chinese economy to rise, but we need not get into them here. The point is that this model is slowly happening here (same system of "public-private partnership) while selling us out.

這與西方國家有什麼關係？簡單來說：中華人民共和國是混合模式（即「21世紀共產主義」或「公司共產主義」或根據墨索里尼的定義的「法西斯共產主義」）的測試場，而我們正在以一種倒過來的方式實施它，即ESG（環境、社會和治理「社會信用」評分，適用於大型指數基金公司管理的公司）。

ESG是正在西方實施的中國模式，但沒有像鄧小平那樣的獨裁控制，而且還以一種倒過來的方式實施，以限制生產。

ESG評分的主要目的是限制和約束西方的生產力，尤其是能源、食品、交通，以及教育作為一個長期計劃。它的目的是逐漸將資本納入鄧式21世紀共產主義-法西斯主義混合模式。

雖然有各種原因導致這個模式被用來打擊西方經濟，同時允許中國經濟崛起，但我們在這裡不必深入探討這些原因。關鍵點是，這個模式正在西方慢慢發生（相同的「公私合作」（public-private partnership）體系），同時出賣我們的利益。

The short takeaway version of this model of Communism (plus Fascism) for the 21st century is that there are two systems in play, one Communist (redistributive and transformational) and the other Fascist (state corporatist), and they're working as a hybrid against liberty.

Fascism, as Mussolini had it, outside of his blatant idolatry of the state (see: https://newdiscourses.com/2024/01/fascism-idolatry-of-the-state/), was continuous with "corporatism," in the sense of a state-corporatist (and cronyist) fusion where people can get rich in business by serving state interests in particular.

When you see the blatantly and exposed as Communist Democratic Party doing much of its Communist implementation through corporations (beholden to their ESG scores) and huge financial institutions, you're right to call them Fascists, not Communists. What gives? They're both!

Only by understanding that Communism picked up Fascism, as was tested in the People's Republic of China under Deng Xiaoping Theory, as orchestrated in part by the same globalist Westerners who run things like the WEF and UN, can you understand how today's Communism works.

這個21世紀共產主義（加上法西斯主義）模式的簡短總結是，有兩種體系在運作：一種是共產主義（再分配和變革的），另一種是法西斯主義（國家公司主義的），它們以混合的形式對抗自由。

正如墨索里尼所說，法西斯主義除了對國家的公然崇拜外（見：newdiscourses.com/20...），與「公司主義」連續，以國家公司主義（和裙帶關係）的融合形式，人們可以通過服務特定的國家利益在商業上致富。

當你看到公然被暴露為共產主義的民主黨通過公司（依賴於其ESG評分）和大型金融機構來實施其共產主義，你有理由稱他們為法西斯主義者，而不是共產主義者。發生了什麼事？他們兩者都是！

只有理解共產主義在鄧小平理論下，在中華人民共和國的測試中吸收了法西斯主義，並且部分是由像世界經濟論壇（WEF）和聯合國（UN）這樣的全球化西方人（globalist Westerners）操縱的，你才能理解今天的共產主義是如何運作的。

Most of the tactics they run are Bolshevik in nature, pushing divisive agitprop into all domains of society in order to destroy rivals one by one and consolidate more and more power to themselves through their current mass-line effort ("the current thing").

The system they're building and installing is ultimately Soviet (council-run) in nature. The Soviet (governing council) is determined by fealty to the prevailing Communist theory, just like Lenin and the Bolsheviks insisted it must be. They're the Vanguard of the revolution.

他們使用的戰術大多是布爾什維克式（Bolshevik）的，將分裂的煽動性宣傳推向社會的各個領域，以逐個摧毀對手，並通過當前的群眾路線努力（即「當前事物」（the current thing））將更多權力集中於自己手中。

他們正在建立和安裝的體系最終是蘇聯（即由委員會管理）的性質。蘇聯（管理委員會）的組成是根據對當前共產主義理論的忠誠度決定的，正如列寧和布爾什維克堅持的那樣。他們是革命的前衛。

In the PRC, that vanguard is explicitly stated as the CCP under Deng Xiaoping Theory and it is the CCP in practice, unquestionably. In the West, it is the "stakeholder capitalist" model described by Klaus Schwab, which the World Economic Forum was created to implement over 50yrs.

In the PRC, the "stakeholders" are the CCP and its leadership. In the West, the "stakeholders" are the cronyist corporate leaders and their bought politicians (Gates, Soros, Fink, Schwab, Kerry, British Royals, etc.). They're creating an ideological governing council (Soviet).

The Stakeholder Soviet, which meets in Davos every January, at least in part (there are other dimensions to it too), is meant to implement the Fascist side of the "Western Dengist" model so that our entire corporate power base enacts its agenda with small businesses (kulaks) lost

在中華人民共和國，這個前衛力量被明確地稱為在鄧小平理論指導下的中國共產黨，在實踐中，這毫無疑問。在西方，它是Klaus Schwab所描述的「利益相關者資本主義」（stakeholder capitalist）模式，世界經濟論壇50年前就是為了實施這一模式而成立的。

在中華人民共和國，利益相關者是指中國共產黨及其領導層。在西方，利益相關者是指裙帶關係的公司領導人及其被收買的政客（蓋茨（Gates）、索羅斯（Soros）、Fink、Schwab、Kerry、英國王室等）。他們正在建立一個意識形態管理委員會（蘇聯）。

每年在達沃斯（Davos）舉行的利益相關者蘇聯會議，至少在一定程度上（它還有其他層面），旨在實施「西方鄧式」模式的法西斯主義方面，以便我們整個企業權力基礎能夠執行其議程，而小企業（富農）則被拋在腦後。

Obviously, the E and S parts of ESG implement directly Communist programming like DEI (Western Korenizatsiya), equity (Western "actual equality" aka total and cultural socialism), and Degrowth to a managed and centrally planned "circular economy," but through corporatism.

The G part of ESG establishes the Fascistic relationship, or, identically, if you want, the Sovietist programming, inside the Western Dengist corporate model, which mirrors the 21st-Century Communism in today's PRC under Xi, running off Deng (plus Kissinger and Rockefeller).

And this is the thing we're actually fighting back against and, not trivially, beating. It's Communism and Fascism at the same time, a whole new Beast unleashed upon the world, and we've been engaged in exposing and destroying its chances for control for years.

顯然，ESG的E和S部分直接實施了共產主義計劃，例如DEI（西方的民族化（Korenizatsiya）），公平（西方的「實際平等」（actual equality），即完全的及社會文化上的社會主義），以及通過公司主義管理和中央計劃的「循環經濟」（circular economy）進行的去增長（Degrowth）。

ESG的G部分確立了法西斯主義的關係，或者說，同樣地，如果你願意，可以說是蘇聯主義的計劃，在西方的鄧式企業模式中，這與今天習近平領導下的中華人民共和國的21世紀共產主義如出一轍，其基礎是鄧小平（加上Kissinger和Rockefeller）的思想。

這就是我們實際正在對抗並擊敗的東西。它同時是共產主義和法西斯主義，一隻被釋放到世界上的全新怪物，而我們多年來一直致力於揭露和摧毀它控制世界的機會。

Americans and other free people in the world reject Communism AND Fascism and fight them at every turn. We've already been proving that for several years now, but we're getting to the truly dangerous part now. This is not going to be an easy 1-4 years.

Currently, in the name of fighting the Communist hand of this hybrid beast, conservatives, primarily, are being lured into adopting its other hand, which is Fascism. Both programs are part of the same program and end in the same place, though, so this is a trick we must avoid.

If you find yourself wondering if Fascist answers to the questions of the day are the right answers and solutions to our problems, it's time to realize you've already been fighting against a Fascist takeover (from the Democrats and RINOs) for years. Clearly, they are not.

To understand this big picture, I encourage you to watch this entire lecture series I gave earlier this year in Dallas to a packed house. It's extremely dense and rushed (probably needs to be twice as many lectures, plus a book), but it's a start.

https://newdiscourses.com/2024/12/the-evilution-of-communism-workshop-all-sessions/

美國人和世界其他自由人士拒絕並反對共產主義和法西斯主義，並在每個轉折點上與之鬥爭。我們已經證明了這點多年了，但現在我們正進入最危險的階段。這不會是輕鬆的1-4年。

目前，以打擊這個混合體中共產主義那隻手為名，主要是保守派，被引誘採用它的另一隻手，即法西斯主義。然而，這兩個計劃是同一個計劃的一部分，最終會到達同一個地方，所以這是一個我們必須避免的陷阱。

如果你發現自己好奇法西斯主義對當今問題的答案是否是正確的答案，以及對我們問題的解決方案，現在是時候意識到你已經多年來一直在對抗法西斯主義的接管（來自民主黨人和偽共和黨人）。顯然，它們不是。

為了理解這個大局，我鼓勵你觀看我今年早些時候在Dallas為一個座無虛席的觀眾所做的整個講座系列。它非常密集且匆忙（可能需要是現在兩倍的講座數量，加上一本書），但這是一個開始。

newdiscourses.com/20...